We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to launch many requests and scheduling simulating human interactions with the application."
"It's a free tool."
"We like that Apache JMeter has different features and different plugins and that they are free of charge."
"It is scalable. You can scale up to 1,000 users in JMeter. If you can put up four slave servers, you can easily ramp up to 1,000 users."
"Scripting with the solution is good."
"It gives accurate results and recommendations that we can implement to enhance the performance of websites."
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs."
"JMeter's most valuable feature is the RegEx Extractor."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"Given that Apache JMeter is a free and open-source tool, documentation improvement may not be a major concern, as it is mostly contributed on a voluntary basis. The essential information is already available. However, in terms of the interface, there are occasional bugs, and the tool may not address them as quickly as some users would like. Fixing defects and bugs might take a considerable amount of time, with users sometimes having to wait for several months or even a year for the next release to address specific issues."
"Self-healing and page rendering for the end-users are not available in Apache JMeter."
"Apache should have a graphic interface."
"Apache JMeter could be a more user-friendly product from the end user's perspective."
"JMeter's reporting is extremely rudimentary. The fundamental reporting mechanisms need to be drastically improved. It doesn't utilize an automatic session management mechanism or methods other tools use like parsing cookies and variables. Everything needs to be done manually. There's no automation."
"The memory utilization in JMeter is very poor."
"Modeling a test is difficult. If you don't have much knowledge, you won't be able to do it easily. Testing APIs is also difficult."
"Until now, JMeter is not supporting most of the protocols."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Katalon Studio, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
