Compare Apache JMeter vs. Telerik Test Studio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
16,747 views|13,815 comparisons
Telerik Test Studio Logo
2,634 views|1,891 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs.""The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.""API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.""The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.""The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

More Telerik Test Studio Pros »

Cons
"The user interface is a little bit tricky.""The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.""The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.""In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.""There is some work to be done with the integration.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

More Telerik Test Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted… more »
Top Answer: Apache JMeter is under Apache License, Version 2.0 licensing. Understanding licensing requirements is important for the implementation of any tool.
Top Answer: This is a difficult question to answer. On one side, JMeter is very flexible and allows for a high amount of customization. On the other, some tasks are common enough that it merits simplifying the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
16,747
Comparisons
13,815
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
485
Rating
7.6
11th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
2,634
Comparisons
1,891
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
165
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn More
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.
Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Telerik Test Studio
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company18%
University6%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise51%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 18 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "A straightforward initial setup, easy to scale and a good user interface". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and LoadUI Pro, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio and Micro Focus UFT One.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.