We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
18,115 views|15,026 comparisons
Tricentis Flood Logo
960 views|667 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting.""The reports and analysis tools are very good. They are the solution's most valuable features.""When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.""The recording and playback functionality is helpful.""The features that I appreciate are quite basic. It is easy to ramp up the threads and start calling the application. A lot of connectors can already be found within Apache JMeter, but we are not using the entire set because the integration between the customers and platform is based on HTTP. We are just going to produce lots of HTTP sequences.""The performance of the solution is excellent."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""Their technical support is awesome.""You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution."

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

Cons
"Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly.""It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations.""JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training.""The reporting is not very good.""Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script.""You really need a technical team in order to really utilize the product."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool.""The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice""I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools.""The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."

More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The biggest thing I liked about it is that there is a huge user base out there, and being shareware and being Apache, if I have any question on how to get something done, I get 18 different answers… more »
Top Answer: It's open-source, so there's no cost. If you need some support from the vendors there will be a charge for that.
Top Answer: I sometimes found the documentation to be not as explanatory as I would've liked it. In the cases that I can think of, I was looking for a rather hand-holding approach with Step A, B, and C, but then… more »
Top Answer: You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.
Top Answer: The positive point we were able to achieve the objective as per plan.
Top Answer: The solution is not in an optimal state. During POC, we analyzed tool is kept on upgrading. The patch deployment is happening in parallel, things that are working today are not working tomorrow. We… more »
Ranking
1st
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
18,115
Comparisons
15,026
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
523
Rating
7.7
11th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
960
Comparisons
667
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
552
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
Flood IO
Learn More
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Computer Software Company17%
Educational Organization11%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government10%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise51%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 15 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with Neotys NeoLoad, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. See our Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.