Apache NiFi vs Azure Stream Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,775 views|1,861 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
9,925 views|8,426 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache NiFi and Azure Stream Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Compute Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use.""We can integrate the tool with other applications easily.""Visually, this is a good product.""The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation.""The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy.""It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between.""The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows.""The initial setup is very easy."

More Apache NiFi Pros →

"Provides deep integration with other Azure resources.""I like all the connected ecosystems of Microsoft, it is really good with other BI tools that are easy to connect.""It's a product that can scale.""The life cycle, report management and crash management features are great.""The integrations for this solution are easy to use and there is flexibility in integrating the tool with Azure Stream Analytics.""We find the query editor feature of this solution extremely valuable for our business.""The solution has a lot of functionality that can be pushed out to companies.""The way it organizes data into tables and dashboards is very helpful."

More Azure Stream Analytics Pros →

Cons
"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs.""More features must be added to the product.""There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not.""The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing.""We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved.""There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible.""I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly.""There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."

More Apache NiFi Cons →

"There may be some issues when connecting with Microsoft Power BI because we are providing the input and output commands, and there's a chance of it being delayed while connecting.""Sometimes when we connect Power BI, there is a delay or it throws up some errors, so we're not sure.""The solution could be improved by providing better graphics and including support for UI and UX testing.""The solution offers a free trial, however, it is too short.""The UI should be a little bit better from a usability perspective.""We would like to have centralized platform altogether since we have different kind of options for data ingestion. Sometimes it gets difficult to manage different platforms.""The solution's interface could be simpler to understand for non-technical people.""Azure Stream Analytics could improve by having clearer metrics as to the scale, more metrics around the data set size that is flowing through it, and performance tuning recommendations."

More Azure Stream Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • More Apache NiFi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of this solution is less than competitors such as Amazon or Google Cloud."
  • "We pay approximately $500,000 a year. It's approximately $10,000 a year per license."
  • "I rate the price of Azure Stream Analytics a four out of five."
  • "The licensing for this product is payable on a 'pay as you go' basis. This means that the cost is only based on data volume, and the frequency that the solution is used."
  • "There are different tiers based on retention policies. There are four tiers. The pricing varies based on steaming units and tiers. The standard pricing is $10/hour."
  • "The current price is substantial."
  • "Azure Stream Analytics is a little bit expensive."
  • "The product's price is at par with the other solutions provided by the other cloud service providers in the market."
  • More Azure Stream Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I am using it open source, so it means it's free for me to use.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization… more »
    Top Answer:Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their… more »
    Top Answer:The product's price is at par with the other solutions provided by the other cloud service providers in the market.
    Top Answer:Azure Stream Analytics was not meeting our company's expectations because it was tedious to change the job, write queries, or if I needed to change something, I needed to stop the entire stream… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    3,775
    Comparisons
    1,861
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    565
    Rating
    7.4
    4th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    9,925
    Comparisons
    8,426
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ASA
    Learn More
    Overview
    Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

    Azure Stream Analytics is a robust real-time analytics service that has been designed for critical business workloads. Users are able to build an end-to-end serverless streaming pipeline in minutes. Utilizing SQL, users are able to go from zero to production with a few clicks, all easily extensible with unique code and automatic machine learning abilities for the most advanced scenarios.

    Azure Stream Analytics has the ability to analyze and accurately process exorbitant volumes of high-speed streaming data from numerous sources at the same time. Patterns and scenarios are quickly identified and information is gathered from various input sources, such as social media feeds, applications, clickstreams, sensors, and devices. These patterns can then be implemented to trigger actions and launch workflows, such as feeding data to a reporting tool, storing data for later use, or creating alerts. Azure Stream Analytics is also offered on Azure IoT Edge runtime, so the data can be processed on IoT devices.

    Top Benefits

    • User friendly: Azure Stream Analytics is very straightforward and easy to use. Out of the box and with a few clicks, users are able to connect to numerous sources and sinks, and easily develop an end-to-end pipeline. Stream Analytics can easily connect to Azure IoT Hub and Azure Event Hub for streaming ingestion, in addition to connecting with Azure Blob storage for historical data ingestion.

    • Flexible deployment: For low-latency analytics, Azure Stream Analytics can run on Azure Stack or IoT edge. For large-scale analytics, the solution can run in the cloud. Azure Stream Analytics uses the same query language and tools for both the cloud and the edge, facilitating an easier process for developers to design exceptional hybrid architectures for streaming processes.

    • Cost-effective: With Azure Stream Analytics, users only pay for the streaming units they consume; there are no upfront costs. Users can easily scale up or down as needed; there is no commitment or cluster provisioning.

    • Trustworthy: Azure Stream Analytics guarantees event processing to be 99.99% available with a minute level of granularity. Azure Stream Analytics has embedded recovery capabilities and checkpoints to keep things running smoothly at all times. Events are never lost with Azure Stream Analytics at-least once delivery of events and exactly one event processing.

    Reviews from Real Users

    “Azure Stream Analytics is something that you can use to test out streaming scenarios very quickly in the general sense and it is useful for IoT scenarios. If I was to do a project with IoT and I needed a streaming solution, Azure Stream Analytics would be a top choice. The most valuable features of Azure Stream Analytics are the ease of provisioning and the interface is not terribly complex.” - Olubisi A., Team Lead at a tech services company.

    “It's used primarily for data and mining - everything from the telemetry data side of things. It's great for streaming and makes everything easy to handle. The streaming from the IoT hub and the messaging are aspects I like a lot.” - Sudhendra U., Technical Architect at Infosys

    Sample Customers
    Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
    Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Compute Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache NiFi is ranked 8th in Compute Service with 10 reviews while Azure Stream Analytics is ranked 4th in Streaming Analytics with 22 reviews. Apache NiFi is rated 7.8, while Azure Stream Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache NiFi writes "Allows the creation and use of custom functions to achieve desired functionality but limitation in handling monthly transactions due to a lack of partitioning for dates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Stream Analytics writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly, but could be priced better". Apache NiFi is most compared with Google Cloud Dataflow, AWS Lambda, Apache Spark, Apache Storm and AWS Fargate, whereas Azure Stream Analytics is most compared with Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, Amazon MSK, Apache Flink and AWS Lambda.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.