Apache Storm vs IBM Streams comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
363 views|303 comparisons
IBM Logo
674 views|593 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Storm and IBM Streams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Compute Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution’s licenses pricing is different from one region to another region. I rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten.
Top Answer:the limited number of connectors. This shall be overcome with work-arounds or eventually buying additional connectors to complete the solution.
Top Answer:We use the solution for data pipeline by modernizing the traditional ETL jobs done through advanced streaming. Another use case is building the g2g streaming platform, which facilitates data exchange… more »
Ranking
14th
out of 16 in Compute Service
Views
363
Comparisons
303
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
674
Comparisons
593
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM InfoSphere Streams
Learn More
Overview
Apache Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm is simple and can be used with any programming language.
IBM Streams is an advanced analytic platform that allows user-developed applications to quickly ingest, analyze and correlate information as it arrives from thousands of data stream sources. The solution can handle very high data throughput rates, up to millions of events or messages per second. Streams helps you analyze data in motion, simplify development of streaming applications, and extend the value of existing systems.
Sample Customers
Groupon, Spotify, The Weather Channel, Twitter, FullContact
Globo TV, All England Lawn Tennis Club, CenterPoint Energy, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Darwin Ecosystem, Emory University Hospital, ICICI Securities, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Living Roads, Mobileum, Optibus, Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), University of Alberta, University of Montana, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Wimbledon 2015
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company17%
University9%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider6%
Government6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Compute Service
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Storm is ranked 14th in Compute Service while IBM Streams is ranked 15th in Streaming Analytics with 5 reviews. Apache Storm is rated 0.0, while IBM Streams is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Streams writes "A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations". Apache Storm is most compared with Apache NiFi and Azure Stream Analytics, whereas IBM Streams is most compared with Confluent, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Flink, Apache Spark and Apache NiFi.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.