Compare Apache Subversion vs. Atlassian SourceTree

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control. Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

More Atlassian SourceTree Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge.
Top Answer: For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree. The way our system works for software deployment, having to install this product is… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
734
Comparisons
652
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
1,977
Comparisons
1,766
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
626
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)
Atlassian SourceTree SourceTree, A fully-featured GUI that offers an efficient, consistent development process right out of the box, a Git and Mercurial desktop client. SourceTree supports Git LFS, allowing teams to track large assets in one single place. The Smart branching with SourceTree and Git-flow is keeping repositories clean and development efficient. SourceTree allows you to search for and clone remote repositories within its simple user interface. It provides Search for commits, file changes, and branches right, interactive rebase tool and Submodules making life easier when managing projects, their dependencies, and other project groupings.
Offer
Learn more about Apache Subversion
Learn more about Atlassian SourceTree
Sample Customers
IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control. Updated: April 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Subversion is ranked 10th in Version Control while Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 4th in Version Control with 1 review. Apache Subversion is rated 0.0, while Atlassian SourceTree is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "User-friendly, easy to scale, and it helps to fix problems with our code repository". Apache Subversion is most compared with Bitbucket, Git, GitHub and IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server, Helix Core and IBM Rational ClearCase.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.