Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
223 views|165 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Atlassian Logo
9,719 views|7,164 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.""Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

More Apache Subversion Pros →

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive.""What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA.""Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner.""This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface.""Bitbucket works, and it's reliable""We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen.""BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."

More Bitbucket Pros →

Cons
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use.""The most valuable feature is CLI."

More Apache Subversion Cons →

"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions.""Technical support is not very fast.""I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol.""Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already.""I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap.""The module component needs improvement.""Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket.""Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."

More Bitbucket Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
  • "With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
  • "Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
  • "We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
  • "I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
  • "I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
  • "Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
  • "When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
  • More Bitbucket Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
    Top Answer:In a small-scale company where I previously worked, cost-saving measures led to a transition from GitLab's dedicated servers to GitHub's cloud-based solution. This switch resulted in significant cost… more »
    Top Answer:The product could be less expensive for small companies.
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    223
    Comparisons
    165
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    286
    Rating
    6.5
    1st
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    9,719
    Comparisons
    7,164
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

    Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

    There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

    1. Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.

    2. Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.

    3. Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.
    4. This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

    • Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
    • Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
    • Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

    Bitbucket Features

    Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.
    • Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.
    • Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.
    • Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.
    • Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.
    • Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.
    • Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.
    • Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

    Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

    Sample Customers
    IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
    Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Media Company9%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Liquibase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.