We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."
"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"I would like to see less updates with the product."
"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"The solution could improve by having more customization."
"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Helix Core. See our Apache Subversion vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
