Compare Apache Subversion vs. GitHub

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Subversion Logo
734 views|652 comparisons
GitHub Logo
2,746 views|2,222 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are… more »
Top Answer: In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security. I didn't try the two-factor authentication so I don't know if they have it already or not. I sometimes found it very difficult to connect… more »
Top Answer: My primary use case for GitHub is for my private projects that I'm developing for my customers. Some customers have their own developers and I sometimes support them to achieve their goals. So we… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
734
Comparisons
652
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
2,746
Comparisons
2,222
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
434
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)
GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
Offer
Learn more about Apache Subversion
Learn more about GitHub
Sample Customers
IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company11%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Subversion is ranked 10th in Version Control while GitHub is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 4 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 0.0, while GitHub is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Very good solution for process automation and team collaboration". Apache Subversion is most compared with Bitbucket, Git, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas GitHub is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit, Helix Core and IBM Rational ClearCase.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.