• Home
  • Apache Web Server vs. WSO2 Carbon [EOL]

Apache Web Server vs WSO2 Carbon [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo

Apache Web Server

Read 21 Apache Web Server reviews
3,673 views|3,087 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo

WSO2 Carbon [EOL]

Read 1 WSO2 Carbon [EOL] review
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ERICO LIMA SCHUCH
Highly valuable, stable, and bug-free
I have been using Apache to host my clients' web-based applications on the Internet for many years. Throughout this time, Apache has proven to be... Read more →
Anonymous User
It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs.
The Data Services Server is a beautiful product which allows you to "expose" your data as REST and/or SOAP services secured or not using any of the... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The apache software is free, open-source."
  • "It is a free-of-cost solution."
  • "There is no licensing cost for the product."
  • "It is an open-source solution."

    • More Apache Web Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Apache Web Server?
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
    Read all 13 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?
    Top Answer:The price of the product is an area handled by the procurement team in my company.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?
    Top Answer:When it comes to Apache Web Server, I don't have any suggestions for improvement because we use it in the UAT environment. For production, my company mainly uses NGINX. There is no direct package… more »
    Read all 12 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
    Views
    3,673
    Comparisons
    3,087
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.7
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Apache HTTP Server
    Carbon
    Learn More
    Apache
    WSO2
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

    This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

    WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx
    Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    University7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 21 reviews while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and Zend PHP Engine, whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.