APCON vs Niagara Packet Brokers comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
APCON Logo
606 views|418 comparisons
Niagara Networks Logo
487 views|314 comparisons
Ranking
Views
606
Comparisons
418
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
487
Comparisons
314
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Niagara Networks
Video Not Available
Overview

APCON's Series 4000 next-generation hybrid visibility platform accommodates an ever growing number of users, data, and applications. The platform delivers high performance and density, scalability, and access to hybrid networks spanning cloud, virtualized, and on-premises infrastructures.

Sample Customers
BP, MLB, Agency of the United States Governent, Vodafone, The Stars Goup
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company14%
Manufacturing Company7%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%

APCON is ranked 6th in Network Packet Broker (NPB) while Niagara Packet Brokers is ranked 7th in Network Packet Broker (NPB). APCON is rated 0.0, while Niagara Packet Brokers is rated 0.0. On the other hand, APCON is most compared with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, Big Switch Networks and Ixia Network Packet Brokers, whereas Niagara Packet Brokers is most compared with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Ixia Network Packet Brokers.

See our list of best Network Packet Broker (NPB) vendors.

We monitor all Network Packet Broker (NPB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.