Apiary vs PokitDok comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
732 views|572 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
PokitDok Logo
52 views|34 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apiary and PokitDok based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.
To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."
  • "It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."
  • More Apiary Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    36th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    732
    Comparisons
    572
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    51st
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    52
    Comparisons
    34
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    PokitDok
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

    The PokitDok API allows you to transmit X12 transactions, schedule appointments into a number of EMRs, as well as search our curated databases of healthcare providers, procedure pricing, medical procedure codes, and more. The API is designed according to REST (Representational State Transfer) principles. The API uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) for requests and responses, and also allows batch processing of ASC X12 5010 compatible EDI files. All API traffic is encrypted over HTTPS and authentication is handled with OAuth2.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe
    The Huffington Post, TechCrunch, Xconomy, MIT Technology Review
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apiary is ranked 36th in API Management while PokitDok is ranked 51st in API Management. Apiary is rated 8.2, while PokitDok is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apiary writes "The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped". On the other hand, Apiary is most compared with SwaggerHub, Oracle API Platform Cloud Service, Apigee and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas PokitDok is most compared with .

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.