Compare Apica LoadTest vs. Silk Performer

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apica LoadTest Logo
247 views|214 comparisons
Silk Performer Logo
904 views|596 comparisons
Ranking
21st
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
247
Comparisons
214
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
904
Comparisons
596
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Apica provides service-level assurance for critical business journeys with early detection and early fixes, preventing loss of revenue, loss of productivity, and user dissatisfaction. Through end-to-end checks that enable successful business outcomes, Apica provides SLA assurance with custom, white-glove service throughout the entire business journey, ensuring that your business outcomes are successful, no matter what your unique requirements and objectives are.

Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

Cloud in
Integrated scalability from the Cloud
Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

Retina scan
Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

Monitor
A leading web support for load and stress testing
Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

Comprehensive mobile performance testing
Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

Offer
Learn more about Apica LoadTest
Learn more about Silk Performer
Sample Customers
HBO
University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apica LoadTest is ranked 21st in Load Testing Tools while Silk Performer is ranked 15th in Load Testing Tools. Apica LoadTest is rated 0.0, while Silk Performer is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Apica LoadTest is most compared with BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Neotys NeoLoad and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.