We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Its licensing cost is very less."
"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
Earn 20 points
Apica provides service-level assurance for critical business journeys with early detection and early fixes, preventing loss of revenue, loss of productivity, and user dissatisfaction. Through end-to-end checks that enable successful business outcomes, Apica provides SLA assurance with custom, white-glove service throughout the entire business journey, ensuring that your business outcomes are successful, no matter what your unique requirements and objectives are.
The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.
Apica LoadTest is ranked 21st in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Apica LoadTest is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Apica LoadTest is most compared with BlazeMeter and Apache JMeter, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.