We performed a comparison between Apigee and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apigee is a very lightweight solution."
"Apigee is very easy to use, and you can code in any language."
"I like implementing different policies, for example, rate-limiting policy."
"Items around the mobilization of the API interface and the ability to automate validations for our APIs are the most valuable aspects."
"The most valuable features of Apigee for me are analytics, security, ease of use, and integration capabilities."
"Apigee's best features are flexibility and breadth of capabilities."
"We use it to build API proxies for securing targeted back-ends with an emphasis on Continuous Integration/Continuous Development (CI/CD)."
"Technical support has been decent."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The solution is scalable."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"I would like to see the monitoring, dashboards, and reports improve."
"The number one area this solution could be improved is by implementing support. Support is not a part of this solution."
"The pricing of the solution could be improved upon. We'd like it if it was less costly."
"In terms of the functionalities of a typical API gateway, Apigee is actually doing its job, but when it involves integration with backend applications, which some gateways have, I don't believe it has this functionality. You have to do Java or do some other low-level coding before you are able to do the integration. Apigee has a lot of components, which means that management will be a bit difficult. It probably has ten different components, and all of these components leverage open-source utilities, such as NGINX. When those open-source vendors upgrade their utility, Apigee usually lags behind because they need to do a lot of tests and any required development in their own platform. They need to do rigorous testing to make sure that nothing breaks. Because of that, it takes them a while to upgrade whatever components have been upgraded by the open-source vendor that owns the utility. We've been chasing them for a particular upgrade for well over a year and a half, and they have not done that upgrade. It is creating a security risk for us as an enterprise, but that upgrade has not been done, even though the open-source vendor, the owner of the utility, has upgraded it a long time ago."
"As it is now, the rotation of certificates is a manual task and is something that can be improved."
"I am still struggling to understand how we can use Apigee as a hybrid system. The pricing of this solution could also be improved as there are multiple new products coming onto the market at competitive price points."
"The Apigee cloud admin UI could be more user-friendly by adding a few more features."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway and WSO2 API Manager, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our Apigee vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
