Appaloosa vs MobileIron Virtual Smartphone Platform [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
24
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Mobile Application Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
Virtual Smartphone Platform
Learn More
Overview
Appaloosa's enterprise app store distributes Apple iOS or Google Android apps to every user in the enterprise, including BYOD users, contracted workers, agencies or part time workers. Appaloosa is a public app stores, drives apps adoption, does not require device management, and is powered by an admin console.
Virtual Smartphone Platform allows IT to secure and manage devices, apps and content providing end-users with instant access to corporate data on the mobile device of their choice. With this purpose built Virtual Smartphone Platform, organizations can spend more time innovating and driving business and less time securing mobile devices.
Sample Customers
BNP Paribas, SNCF, Natixis, Saint Gobain, ORTEC, Air Liquide, Canal+
Brussels Airport, Astellas, Standtwerke University, ARUP, Ingram, UniCredit

Appaloosa is ranked 5th in Mobile Application Management while MobileIron Virtual Smartphone Platform [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Application Management. Appaloosa is rated 0.0, while MobileIron Virtual Smartphone Platform [EOL] is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of MobileIron Virtual Smartphone Platform [EOL] writes "Accessing documents on your mobile while traveling is essential but screen share suppport could be helpful. ". Appaloosa is most compared with Microsoft Intune, whereas MobileIron Virtual Smartphone Platform [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Mobile Application Management vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Application Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.