We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile APM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that I like best are the dashboard and Business Journey."
"The solution helps us save a lot of time on certain tasks."
"It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"From the performance management side, I like everything from business transaction work to tracking. On the database side, we can get a lot of insights from the database. On the server monitoring side, it helped us a lot to find out some of the issues on the VM side because VMs were creating a little trouble for us."
"The ability to check parameters for microservice applications is most valuable. It is important for me. I can manually create new business transactions for applications and individually monitor business transactions. I can also use a lot of extensions. It has a lot of extensions to monitor other third-party applications, such as NoSQL applications, memory cache applications, Kafka applications, and Couchbase applications. It is very useful. We are also using the end-user monitoring site to follow all end-user activities. It is important for us to check the errors on the customer site."
"Autodiscovery of application topology, based on real user traffic."
"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"While it is scalable, it could be better."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"In the current version of AppDynamics, there is a correlated section, where we can see all servers’ performance along with application performance, but network performance is missing."
"I would like to see more artificial intelligence and machine learning brought in to monitor the statement and payment sum issues we have."
"Additional support for NextGen mobile platforms also needs to be high in the roadmap prioritizations"
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"It could be a little more flexible in configuration on the back end."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics is ranked 3rd in Mobile APM with 153 reviews while AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with . See our AppDynamics vs. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring report.
See our list of best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
