AppDynamics APM vs CA APM

AppDynamics APM is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 75 reviews vs CA APM which is ranked 1st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 88 reviews. The top reviewer of AppDynamics APM writes "I don't have to explain or "translate" transaction snapshots. It rules out the people I don't have to talk to". The top reviewer of CA APM writes "There is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place. The initial setup is complex". AppDynamics APM is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic APM and CA APM. CA APM is most compared with AppDynamics APM, New Relic APM and Dynatrace. See our AppDynamics APM vs CA APM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics APM vs. CA APM and others in Application Performance Management (APM)
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing AppDynamics APM vs CA APM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage.Autodiscovery of application topology, based on real user traffic.Despite dozens of deployments across hundreds of applications- we have yet to see a case where AD is negatively impacting application execution or functionality.Before we moved the code to AppDynamics, we had to compare the agile process and also had to make sure that they're following the standards.Applications: This provides us insight into how our applications are performing within our environments and affords us the ability to identify opportunities and make changes to code / environment to effect positive performance lift.The most valuable feature is the live reporting on the current health\performance of our applicationIt allows us to configure health rules so that we can, based on our own experience, determine when an application is behaving incorrectly.It reduces the time to resolve issues and requires less manpower.

Read more »

The CA tools allow to me to get into detailed transactions for custom ranking, and be able to make predictions. It also gathers data. Some other tools may be good at one area, but not good overall, including the mainframe.It covers from mainframe, all the way to dotcom, for example. CA currently covers Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Office 365 monitoring.It has a random transaction trace which gives our customers the ability to look at how their transaction performs.This application pulls data in 15 seconds. You can imagine the enormous amount of data which streams through.Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part.We are able to easily and quickly find some of the problems with the applications and coding, and some of the performance problems.We did the setup for a new datacenter, and that was pretty straightforward.The APM tool allows us to monitor performance of that application, where are the pain points, where are the slowdowns, to focus on where we can fix those.

Read more »

Cons
There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings.The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see.Additional support for next gen mobile platforms also need to be high in the road map prioritizationsIt would help to maybe have a more graphical interface and more user-friendly graphics.I’d like to see better out-of-the-box visual reporting so that we can roll this up to management.I think I would like to see a better way to deploy and upgrade the machine agents that we use. Currently, we have to use SCCM, and that might just be our environment with the customer.The network diagnostics that they are adding will be really useful. They could add more detail into what is going on in the network.It could be a little more flexible in configuration on the back end.

Read more »

Documentation needs to be centralized.Its profiling. The uniqueness instead of me looking at sampling data, I need to know the m-1 event that actually triggered my scenario where that m event caused a catastrophic event, like a ripple effect; I need to know that m-1. What triggered my major event means I need to understand the event that triggered it and before the cause of that event itself.The initial setup is complex.The interface is getting a little old.One of the challenges is agent releases. So as we employ agents, they are done relatively manually. A little bit of automating of agent release would be helpful.The upcoming changes for the deployment process of the agent will help a lot, in that others have gotten to that point first.​It should be easier to install or set everything up. ​Stability could actually be helped because it is a wrapper or an agent on our system. If we are having a bad day in production or if other resources are being utilized, then we will get get gaps in our monitoring system.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Because it is priced per JVM, the price can increase pretty fast, into the millions. We have had challenges because we had to justify the price to our clients, as well, when we are putting in certain tools.It could be cheaper. It's a little cost prohibitive. There are so many features that also show a lot of value, but it’s not always easy to justify the cost.It is not a cheap tool, but you also save in manpower to setup because it is easy and fast. At the end of the day, I think the revenue is much better. BUT, they have an awful co-term mode of licensing.As a technical person, and as an application development team, they all understand that this is the right tool for us. But when it comes to budget and financial matters, it takes days and weeks to convince upper management to buy this tool. So they should do something more on licensing costs.The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.

Read more »

On pricing, CA is very competitive. I think that's going to help in the long run.Pricing and licensing are not issues.Negotiate a lot, but do not forget to buy the product because it is worth it.There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example.Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth itDepends on the size of the product you need.

Read more »

Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics APM vs. CA APM and others in Application Performance Management (APM)
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
41,935
Comparisons
20,136
Reviews
75
Followers
2,955
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
55,290
Comparisons
9,920
Reviews
91
Followers
3,163
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Dynatrace logo 80x80
Compared 9% of the time.
Nr
Compared 7% of the time.
Ca2
Compared 6% of the time.
See more AppDynamics APM competitors »
Logo green 80x80
Compared 9% of the time.
Nr
Compared 8% of the time.
Dynatrace logo 80x80
Compared 7% of the time.
See more CA APM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsAppDCA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA
Website/Video
Website/VideoAppDynamics
  • Vendor 6851 screenshot 1517677721
CA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1516099828
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

AppDynamics is the Application Intelligence company. With AppDynamics, enterprises have real-time insights into application performance, user performance and business performance so they can move faster in an increasingly sophisticated, software-driven world. AppDynamics’ integrated suite of applications is built on its innovative, enterprise-grade App iQ Platform that enables its customers to make faster decisions that enhance customer engagement and improve operational and business performance. AppDynamics is uniquely positioned to enable enterprises to accelerate their digital transformations by actively monitoring, analyzing and optimizing complex application environments at scale. 

CA Application Performance Management (CA APM) is the solution global brands trust to proactively identify and resolve performance and availability issues across physical, virtual, cloud, and mobile applications. Patent-pending analytics provides expertise in the form of guided assisted triage workflows for in-depth, root-cause diagnostics across development and production applications, simplifying and speeding the time it takes to find and fix issues.

CA APM scales to your organization’s needs and automatically correlates multiple sources of data to help you sort through the data and act decisively, helping to improve user experience and application performance.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersCisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customersLexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
19%
Software R&D Company
12%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
Insurance Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Media Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
38%
Insurance Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
29%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Media Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
74%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
65%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
15%
Large Enterprise
70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
32%
Large Enterprise
59%
Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics APM vs. CA APM and others in Application Performance Management (APM)
Download now
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email