AppDynamics APM vs CA APM

AppDynamics APM is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 76 reviews vs CA APM which is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 80 reviews. The top reviewer of AppDynamics APM writes "I don't have to explain or "translate" transaction snapshots. It rules out the people I don't have to talk to". The top reviewer of CA APM writes "There is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place. The initial setup is complex". AppDynamics APM is most compared with Dynatrace, CA APM and New Relic APM. CA APM is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics APM and New Relic APM. See our AppDynamics APM vs CA APM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Quotes From Members Comparing AppDynamics APM vs CA APM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It has improved my organization because we are able to proactively and reactively look at performance issues.We are able to correlate performance between tiers.Despite dozens of deployments across hundreds of applications- we have yet to see a case where AD is negatively impacting application execution or functionality.Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage.Autodiscovery of application topology, based on real user traffic.Before we moved the code to AppDynamics, we had to compare the agile process and also had to make sure that they're following the standards.Applications: This provides us insight into how our applications are performing within our environments and affords us the ability to identify opportunities and make changes to code / environment to effect positive performance lift.The most valuable feature is the live reporting on the current health\performance of our application

Read more »

Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part.Cross-VM transaction traces provide a complete "what happened where".Proactive snapshots of transactions and all details of a transaction are saved in case of an error.Attribute decoration is a unique and very powerful feature. We can add meaningful meta information based on our internal demand.We get an alarm, an email, and a text when something is down.​Deep Dive and Transaction Analysis Triage capability.​It is very useful and helpful with the analysis of historical performance data.WAS GC monitoring enhanced our application performance and DB SQL performance.

Read more »

Cons
It needs strengthening in the database tiers.Additional support for next gen mobile platforms also need to be high in the road map prioritizationsThere needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings.The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see.It would help to maybe have a more graphical interface and more user-friendly graphics.I’d like to see better out-of-the-box visual reporting so that we can roll this up to management.I think I would like to see a better way to deploy and upgrade the machine agents that we use. Currently, we have to use SCCM, and that might just be our environment with the customer.The network diagnostics that they are adding will be really useful. They could add more detail into what is going on in the network.

Read more »

Its profiling. The uniqueness instead of me looking at sampling data, I need to know the m-1 event that actually triggered my scenario where that m event caused a catastrophic event, like a ripple effect; I need to know that m-1. What triggered my major event means I need to understand the event that triggered it and before the cause of that event itself.The initial setup is complex.I would like to see intelligence, deep intelligence or deep analytics.The following need improvement: 1) Integration of third-party content into app maps (e.g. data coming from beats/elastic platform). 2) Support of new application server technologies, time to adopt new versions of them. 3) Dashboarding capabilities (as with all other vendors). 4) Application architecture of the central Enterprise Manager should be developed into a cloud native architecture. 5) Mitigation of SPOF – PostgreSQL database, behind Team Center.We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure.​Maybe an agreement between CA and Microsoft that these two products can be used at the same time on the same server.​User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment.System incident analysis and performance monitoring need improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It would be better if there were more solutions incorporated into the base price. ​The way it is structured in terms of price could be better. You pay for individual modules and that adds on to the cost, which detracts you from implementing those modules and slows you down.Take into consideration what you get for specific pricing models and how much it costs to add on things you may need later.​Because it is priced per JVM, the price can increase pretty fast, into the millions. We have had challenges because we had to justify the price to our clients, as well, when we are putting in certain tools.It could be cheaper. It's a little cost prohibitive. There are so many features that also show a lot of value, but it’s not always easy to justify the cost.It is not a cheap tool, but you also save in manpower to setup because it is easy and fast. At the end of the day, I think the revenue is much better. BUT, they have an awful co-term mode of licensing.As a technical person, and as an application development team, they all understand that this is the right tool for us. But when it comes to budget and financial matters, it takes days and weeks to convince upper management to buy this tool. So they should do something more on licensing costs.The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.

Read more »

On pricing, CA is very competitive. I think that's going to help in the long run.Pricing and licensing are not issues.Negotiate a lot, but do not forget to buy the product because it is worth it.There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example.Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth itDepends on the size of the product you need.

Read more »

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
38,292
Comparisons
18,576
Reviews
74
Followers
2,716
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
43,829
Comparisons
8,993
Reviews
81
Followers
2,954
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Dynatrace logo 80x80
Compared 25% of the time.
Ca2
Compared 12% of the time.
Nr
Compared 10% of the time.
See more AppDynamics APM competitors »
Dynatrace logo 80x80
Compared 25% of the time.
Appdynamics logo stacked rgb deepspace
Compared 24% of the time.
Nr
Compared 13% of the time.
See more CA APM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsAppDCA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA
Website/Video
Website/VideoAppDynamics
  • Vendor 6851 screenshot 1523121283
CA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1524992460
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

AppDynamics is the Application Intelligence company. With AppDynamics, enterprises have real-time insights into application performance, user performance and business performance so they can move faster in an increasingly sophisticated, software-driven world. AppDynamics’ integrated suite of applications is built on its innovative, enterprise-grade App iQ Platform that enables its customers to make faster decisions that enhance customer engagement and improve operational and business performance. AppDynamics is uniquely positioned to enable enterprises to accelerate their digital transformations by actively monitoring, analyzing and optimizing complex application environments at scale. 

CA Application Performance Management (CA APM) is the solution global brands trust to proactively identify and resolve performance and availability issues across physical, virtual, cloud, and mobile applications. Patent-pending analytics provides expertise in the form of guided assisted triage workflows for in-depth, root-cause diagnostics across development and production applications, simplifying and speeding the time it takes to find and fix issues.

CA APM scales to your organization’s needs and automatically correlates multiple sources of data to help you sort through the data and act decisively, helping to improve user experience and application performance.

OFFER
Learn more about AppDynamics APM
Free Trial

No credit card required. It's easy and free for 30 days.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersCisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customersLexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
19%
Software R&D Company
12%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Retailer
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Media Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
37%
Insurance Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
29%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Insurance Company
8%
Media Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
15%
Large Enterprise
73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
65%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
9%
Midsize Enterprise
32%
Large Enterprise
58%

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Appdynamics apm vs. ca apm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email