Compare AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the one that enables you to have visibility into the end-users journey.""The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring.""The most valuable feature is that we can see how our end-users are interacting with our application across regions."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pros »

"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.""There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server.""The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.""For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

"AppD is really cool and a unified solution for both APM and APM centric Analytics side. We can show almost all business data within the APM context from the end-user perspetive. But this process is a little bit manual. If they catch and map business journeys based on customer interaction on the browser automatically, it should be really fine.""I would like to see support for mobile testing and mobile monitoring.""I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Cons »

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.""Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This price of this product is expensive.""AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice »

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the one that enables you to have visibility into the end-users journey.
Top Answer: We currently only count the pages. We measured around 10 million pages in a year which is equal to one agent, one… more »
Top Answer: AppD is really cool and a unified solution for both APM and APM centric Analytics side. We can show almost all business… more »
Top Answer: For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.
Top Answer: The tool dashboards are not good and don't meet our customers' needs. Because of this we generally use open source tools… more »
Top Answer: Our company manages four different city hospital environments and all of them have SiteScope but each uses a different… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
Learn
VMware
AppDynamics
Micro Focus
Overview

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

How do real users experience your browser-based applications? Using browser real-user monitoring follow their journey and optimize their experience with powerful end-to-end performance management that rapidly identifies application issues and relevant business transactions, and dramatically reduces MTTR.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Offer
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Learn more about AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope
Sample Customers
Box, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, LyftSony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, ExpediaVodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm12%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider15%
University8%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is ranked 21st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is ranked 26th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is rated 9.0, while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring writes "Enables you to have visibility into your users' journey and has good session monitoring features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Elastic APM, Akamai mPulse, ITRS Geneos and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, whereas Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager. See our AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.