Bharath Babu KasimsettySr. Manager Digital & Technology at CBRE Group, Inc.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the one that enables you to have visibility into the end-users journey."
"The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is that we can see how our end-users are interacting with our application across regions."
"It is a stable solution that helps address user issues well."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM)."
"AppD is really cool and a unified solution for both APM and APM centric Analytics side. We can show almost all business data within the APM context from the end-user perspetive. But this process is a little bit manual. If they catch and map business journeys based on customer interaction on the browser automatically, it should be really fine."
"I would like to see support for mobile testing and mobile monitoring."
"I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications."
"If you have a single URL and all the operations are coming in as part of the header, you will not be able to segregate them for different actions."
"The solution does not provide input on how the page performs in a big group. It just says that the page performance is bad, but it does not say what can be done to improve it. If they could provide some insight or guidance on how to make improvements, that would be a big help."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"This price of this product is expensive."
"AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors."
"AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring does have licensing cost associated with it."
"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."
"This is an expensive product."
Earn 20 points
How do real users experience your browser-based applications? Using browser real-user monitoring follow their journey and optimize their experience with powerful end-to-end performance management that rapidly identifies application issues and relevant business transactions, and dramatically reduces MTTR.
AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while New Relic Browser is ranked 38th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.4, while New Relic Browser is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring writes "A stable solution to monitor user behavior, but the functionality needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic Browser writes "Stable and scalable but does not provide input regarding page performance". AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is most compared with Elastic APM, AWS X-Ray, Akamai mPulse, ITRS Geneos and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront, whereas New Relic Browser is most compared with Elastic APM, New Relic APM, Datadog, Akamai mPulse and SolarWinds AppOptics. See our AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. New Relic Browser report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.