We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Database Monitoring and CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The most valuable features of AppDynamics Database Monitoring are you can configure the performance and see in real-time what is exactly happening with the applications. Additionally, the dashboards are good."
"Data monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring's dashboarding is its best feature."
"The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."
"The dashboards are very well-defined."
"AppDynamics is scalable. They can monitor billions of transactions because they're not monitoring all transactions. They're monitoring samples. So, they can offer good monitoring for the huge sites."
"We were able to correct problems, which led to an increase in availability, time savings, and performance for our solutions."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring would be improved with more support for microservices architecture."
"The solution needs to support IBM products."
"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."
"The solution should add some monitoring similar to Oracle monitoring tools for databases. It has a lot of features to monitor SQL queries, and make some recommendation to resolve it. AppDynamics is just monitoring for delays and doesn't provide any recommendations for that. It's a deficiency."
"The solution must improve security and setup."
"The solution could improve the server size for AppDynamics to include middleware products, which is doesn't yet cover. If they add middleware for sophisticated sites, AppDynamics would be the global choice."
"It could be more user-friendly for beginners."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is rated 7.8, while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Database Monitoring writes "Good application performance features along with a very simple and tool navigation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". AppDynamics Database Monitoring is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and AWS X-Ray, whereas CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
