We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Database Monitoring and INETCO Insight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Knowing which tables on the database were working the most was valuable. It helped the client understand where they need to focus. They streamlined a lot of their queries and brought the resource usage down. It helped them to find long-running queries. They rewrote them completely so that they don't take as long and the application performs better."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is that we can see all query times. If a particular query is taking too much time, we can alert it."
"AppDynamics is a good tool that offers excellent out-of-the-box dashboards and application topology."
"The solution is very, very stable. We haven't faced any bugs or glitches on the system."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring's most valuable feature is the ability of the out-of-the-box to update the information, provide various metrics, and possibly include custom metrics."
"The product is easy to install, it took about half an hour. The use and the configurations are simple as well."
"The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."
"Data monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"It provides real-time information alerts."
"We can have a real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution."
"This can help customers who already have a lot of monitoring providers consolidate what they have."
"Based on the user experience feedback that we have had, I think that the most important thing to improve is the availability of the SaaS, the cloud environment."
"The solution needs to support IBM products."
"The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it."
"The setup, implementation and use are clumsy and need to be refined."
"The application monitoring needs improvement. It needs to be easier for someone who isn't a proficient developer."
"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring would be a better product if it could support new technology, such as cloud technology. Even Dynatrace lacks support for newer technologies."
"I have found it sometimes a bit difficult to trace the transaction all the way through to the application. I'm not sure if that problem is on the database side or on the application side, but that would be something that I would like to be improved. The traceability from the application to the database, sometimes, is a bit of a challenge. If you're using AppDynamics, with the Java agent, for instance, you need to be able to trace it through."
"It would help to have historical information."
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews while INETCO Insight is ranked 35th in Payment Processing Software. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is rated 7.8, while INETCO Insight is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Database Monitoring writes "Good application performance features along with a very simple and tool navigation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of INETCO Insight writes "Provides real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution". AppDynamics Database Monitoring is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and AWS X-Ray, whereas INETCO Insight is most compared with Dynatrace.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
