AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Database Monitoring and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You have a live view of what happens when something goes wrong on the production or support side. You don't have to scramble and do guesswork. We can identify the query that creates the bottleneck or slows the performance of the database system. It can give you points on how to debug and fix the system.""AppDynamics Database Monitoring's dashboarding is its best feature.""The solution is very, very stable. We haven't faced any bugs or glitches on the system.""Data monitoring is the most valuable feature.""AppDynamics is a good tool that offers excellent out-of-the-box dashboards and application topology.""Visibility to the end-users is a valuable feature.""In my experience, it's easy to use. There's nothing complex to learn or fear. You can quickly adapt to it without the need for extensive training.""The product is easy to install, it took about half an hour. The use and the configurations are simple as well."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Pros →

"It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers.""Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur.""Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive.""Dell Foglight does analyze and optimize your virtual infrastructure. It definitely reduces operational cost.""The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end.""With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session.""Infrastructure Monitoring and End User Monitoring are the product’s most valuable features to me.""Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Stability-wise, we experienced some performance issues when upgrading from 4.4 to 4.5.""The solution needs to support IBM products.""The solution could improve the server size for AppDynamics to include middleware products, which is doesn't yet cover. If they add middleware for sophisticated sites, AppDynamics would be the global choice.""I would like the solution to be more customizable to meet our client's requirements.""They could align the product strategy to evolve as a complete solution.""The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it.""The application end of AppDynamics Database Monitoring needs to improve by checking which applications consume licenses.""The major concern lies with reports, specifically their configurability. It's like, if I want to combine multiple reports and generate them all at once, that's not possible. Even though there's a setup for generating 25 reports, I wanted to group them all and generate them in one go, which isn't currently feasible. I have to manually run each report and set the time for it."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Cons →

"I want to see mobile access application in the next release.""SQL agents often failed but again this may have been addressed in future versions.""I would perhaps like to see more SSMS connections.""The “cartridge” concept for every little thing is a bit of a bother to implement.""I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace.""There are some metrics I'd like to track that are difficult to find or implement into a tracking solution without a lot of manual work.""We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort.""They need to improve the stability of FxM and FxV."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."
  • "Pricing is based on the size of the deployment."
  • "There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."
  • "It could be a bit lower, but looking at the scalability, functionality, and other things, you can understand why AppDynamics is so expensive as compared to some of the cheaper products that don't have that full single pane of glass they've got. Dynatrace has got three different elements that you need to log into just to get a full view, which is not so good, and because of that, it is a bit cheaper."
  • "The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."
  • "We have purchased a few licenses for AppDynamics Database Monitoring and the price is high."
  • "The license for AppDynamics is procured by our customers."
  • "We have a license-based solution. That means you need a license for each server you monitor."
  • More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."
  • "The price is expensive for us."
  • "Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."
  • "Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."
  • More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases.
    Top Answer:We buy the platform's yearly subscription. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:They could align the product strategy to evolve as a complete solution similar to Cisco Observability.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    784
    Comparisons
    552
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Foglight, Dell Foglight
    Learn More
    Quest Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    More than half of application performance bottlenecks originate in the database, but most application teams have little or no visibility into database performance. With AppDynamics' database performance management product, you get 100% visibility into application performance, from the browser to the database.

    Key Benefits

    • Visualize end-to-end application performance, from the browser to the database
    • Get alerts when database thresholds are violated
    • Monitor key performance metrics like top users, programs, SQL, objects and more.
    • See execution plans for slow SQL to isolate performance bottlenecks
    Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
    Sample Customers
    Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
    Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm41%
    Retailer18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Wholesaler/Distributor6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Educational Organization11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppDynamics Database Monitoring is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is rated 7.8, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Database Monitoring writes "Good application performance features along with a very simple and tool navigation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] writes "We evaluated other options including BMC, but chose Foglight for it's notifications & the ability to review the history". AppDynamics Database Monitoring is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and AWS X-Ray, whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with Catchpoint.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.