"Speeds up app deployment and management."
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM."
"Internet-based access with security is what I have found to be most valuable. It is also a stable and scalable solution."
"It is a helpful tool to manage BYOD policies."
"In terms of technical support, you will get an immediate response."
"Mobile device management is most valuable."
"We have a BYOD policy, and this solution helps us manage our devices."
"I haven't used other mobile device management solutions, but compared to SCCM, we eliminate a lot of on-premises infrastructure and maintenance by using Intune."
"The solution has reduced the risk of security breaches by 30%."
"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."
"Needs a better API."
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further."
"We haven't really gone through all the features of Intune. We are just discovering them. Every day, we see a new feature that we want to apply, but what will be great for Intune is to be able to deploy apps in a simple fashion. We should be able to easily install various apps on the Windows platform, iOS, and Android. Currently, we have to write some scripts. It's not as straightforward as we would like it to be. It should be simplified so that we can do it just with three clicks—next, next, finish—without needing to write a script."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"The reports aren't complete, and it's not easy to build custom reports. For example, Windows Autopilot isn't working well in cases where the computers don't have a good internet connection. Then the option is not good enough."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me."
"Lacking in features such as Wi-Fi and network security."
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Application Management while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 164 reviews. Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Entra ID.
We monitor all Mobile Application Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
