"Speeds up app deployment and management."
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"Needs a better API."
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Application Management while SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6, while SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
We monitor all Mobile Application Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
