Digital.ai App Management [EOL] vs Jamf Connect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
JAMF Logo
634 views|333 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM.""​Speeds up app deployment and management."

More Digital.ai App Management [EOL] Pros →

"It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need.""It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect.""Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall.""Jamf Connect allows for easy and seamless joining of Mac devices to Azure AD, eliminating the need for third-party involvement or support engineer assistance.""The solution is scalable.""The most valuable feature is the synchronization of passwords with a local password, which works well.""I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten.""The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."

More Jamf Connect Pros →

Cons
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further.""Needs a better API."

More Digital.ai App Management [EOL] Cons →

"The solution needs to improve its licensing.""When a Mac is joined to Azure, the generic Pro console in the MDM should accurately display the Mac as joined to Azure in the inventory section. Currently, it shows "no domain account found," which can be misleading.""The configuration could be faster.""We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA.""Overall, there is a lack of consistent experience sometimes with some of their features.""The logs are an area with a shortcoming.""The solution's UI could be more user-friendly for the setup process.""Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."

More Jamf Connect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's relatively inexpensive."
  • "The pricing model could be improved, especially considering the availability of alternative MDM solutions like Kandji, which offers similar features for free or at a lower cost."
  • "We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices."
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "I rate the cost as three out of ten, with ten being the highest."
  • "Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • More Jamf Connect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Application Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Jamf Connect is an identity provider, and once you log in, you will have all the device's access.
    Top Answer:Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive. You have to pay the deployment charges separately, and you have to pay premium support costs if you take it.
    Top Answer:The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Mobile Application Management
    8th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    634
    Comparisons
    333
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    497
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Arxan Apperian, Apperian, Apperian App Management, Arxan Apperian App Management
    Wandera, Wandera Private Access
    Learn More
    Overview

    Shifts to the ‘extended enterprise’ mobile workforce require increased mobile collaboration and productivity apps. IT teams must securely distribute apps and support users’ needs. Enterprise mobile app management (MAM) enables IT to balance the unique needs of IT and remote users.

    Wandera Threat Defense helps businesses ensure a productive workforce, by defending both managed and unmanaged devices against the full spectrum of mobile threats. The solution includes security protections on the device and in the network, allowing for effective and targeted policy actions against even the most sophisticated attacks. Wandera Threat Defense is powered by MI:RIAM, a leading threat intelligence engine that learns in real-time through signals from 425 million sensors around the globe.

    Sample Customers
    DLL Group, NetApp, New Balance, Nvidia, Transportation Security Administration, Nationwide, Northrup Grumman, Santam, AT&T, McAfee, Georgia Southern University, Emory University,
    Mastercard, Deloitte, PayPal, Toshiba, BNP Paribas, EY, Otis, Rollins, Eurostar, Frontier, Sealy, Rolex, VITAS Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%

    Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Application Management while Jamf Connect is ranked 8th in ZTNA as a Service with 10 reviews. Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Jamf Connect is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jamf Connect writes "Enhances user convenience by streamlining login processes". Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Jamf Connect is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, VMware Workspace ONE, Netskope Private Access and Microsoft Intune.

    We monitor all Mobile Application Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.