We performed a comparison between Appian and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"Appian's most valuable feature is that we can create end-to-end process workflows with minimum turnaround."
"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."
"Write to Data Store Entity - Saving data in SQL databases is done easily using entities. Entities (CDTs in Appian terminology) define relationships and target schema tables via XSD files."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"The most valuable features of Appian are workflow management and the ease with which you can build the UI."
"It is really simple to create a new app, and I like the data-centric aspect of the BPM tool."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"It is quite good."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The stability is very good."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"I wouldn't say their response time is long, but it could be quicker."
"It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The user interface can be improved."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"The vertical application could be improved."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.