We performed a comparison between Appian and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is the most complete solution of its kind."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine"
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"Appian also has very flexible local integration."
"What I found most valuable in Appian is that it lets you drill down on multiple things through the structure of the reporting and UI side. It's also low-code, yet it results in quick deliverables."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The support team responds fast."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"Appian has a few areas for improvement, which my organization raised with the Appian team. One is the Excel output which is limited to fifty columns when it should be up to two hundred or three hundred columns."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and Bizagi. See our Appian vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.