We performed a comparison between Appian and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Technical support is helpful."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"Appian has a few areas for improvement, which my organization raised with the Appian team. One is the Excel output which is limited to fifty columns when it should be up to two hundred or three hundred columns."
"There are four areas I believe Appian could improve in. The first is a seamless contact center integration. Appian does not have a contact center feature. The second is advanced features in RPA. The third would be chatbot and email bot integration—while Appian comes with chatbot and email bot, it's not as mature as it should be, compared to the competition. The fourth area would be next best action, since there is not much of this sort of feature in Appian. These are all features which competitors' products have, and in a mature manner, whereas Appian lacks on these four areas. I see customers who are moving from Appian to Pega because these features are not in Appian."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.