We performed a comparison between Appian and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"The product's most valuable feature is the low code aspect of development. We can develop an end-to-end VPN solution using a single platform."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"Even with an on-premise implementation, the scalability is still high, so it is easy to scale up."
"Rapid development with low-code makes it easier to quickly get apps implemented and the time to break-even and ROI is much faster."
"It provides us with real-time data on all connected systems in terms of how they're integrated with each other and how they are performing in a workflow manner."
"The tech support is quite good."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"One room for improvement is the ease of UI UX development, like in OutSystems and Mendix."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"My only request is that they decrease the license costs."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while AuraQuantic is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM. See our Appian vs. AuraQuantic report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.