We performed a comparison between Appian and Bosch inubit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features."
"The most valuable features of Appian are workflow management and the ease with which you can build the UI."
"The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn."
"Appian is a very low code platform. It's very easy to learn and use."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"My only request is that they decrease the license costs."
"Occasionally, certain pre-made modules may not be necessary and customers may desire greater customization options. Instead of being limited to pre-designed features, they may prefer a more flexible version that allows for greater customization."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"There are some restrictions with respect to using external components within Appian. So, for example, if we do not have a particular feature available, there's a long cycle of getting approvals and all of that. That does not offer flexibility, which definitely can be improved on."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while Bosch inubit is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Bosch inubit is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda and SAP Signavio Process Manager.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.