Compare Appian vs. Comindware Suite

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
35,334 views|23,059 comparisons
Appian Logo
14,452 views|10,816 comparisons
Comindware Suite Logo
51 views|22 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Comindware Suite? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost depends on the number of users, although I recommend taking an unlimited license.""The solution offers a monthly subscription model. That's what we use. I recall it being about $90 a month. They do have different tiers.""It's an enterprise tool and can be used by enterprise only. So it's a very expensive tool."

More Appian Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Learn
camunda
Appian
Comindware
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
With Appian, your organization can rapidly build, deploy, use, and scale problem-solving apps. And with the flexibility of on-premises and cloud portability, you'll always address your unique challenges the way that makes the most sense for you.

Unmatched industry knowledge and implementation-proven expertise. Full service suite including consulting and business analysis, solution architecture definition and configuration as well as solution implementation and post-production support.

Be that a major business transformation program or a low-code app set up for a small team – both such initiatives will require analysis of the existing system capabilities, definition of business objectives and target KPI’s as well as ultimately building a business case.

Comindware will provide implementation proven knowledge and expertise and will deliver:

  • Initial assessment of the business and IT needs and objectives
  • Business case compilation
  • Existing system, data and process assessment
  • Solution architecture design


Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Appian
Learn more about Comindware Suite
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentHansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of TennesseeAnthem, United Card Service, Volkswagen, Gazprom, ExxonMobil, Covidien Ltd.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Non Profit15%
Government15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
University17%
Computer Software Company17%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: December 2020.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Appian is ranked 7th in Business Process Management with 8 reviews while Comindware Suite is ranked 63rd in Business Process Management. Appian is rated 8.8, while Comindware Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Offers flexible local integration that we have used extensively to integrate with our Legacy system". On the other hand, Appian is most compared with ServiceNow, Pega BPM, Mendix, OutSystems and IBM BPM, whereas Comindware Suite is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.