Compare Appian vs. Comindware Tracker

Appian is ranked 6th in Business Process Management with 11 reviews while Comindware Tracker is ranked 7th in Business Process Management with 15 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "We are creating workflows in an agile manner". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Enables the seamless addition and changing of data and processes with no interruption to our business operations". Appian is most compared with Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Camunda BPM, whereas Comindware Tracker is most compared with Camunda BPM. See our Appian vs. Comindware Tracker report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appian Logo
10,980 views|7,654 comparisons
Comindware Tracker Logo
8,569 views|1,429 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Form building capabilities and well thought out process modelling are key points to this product.The process models provide self-documenting systems.Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed.Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored.Another advantage of this tool is its reports and records. You can maintain dashboards, layouts. If you with a Java solution, it takes six months time. If you use this tool, you can finish in one or one and a half months' time.There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements.Call Web Service Smart Service - Web service integrations with other systems are super simple and fast to create, supported by low code menus.Write to Data Store Entity - Saving data in SQL databases is done easily using entities. Entities (CDTs in Appian terminology) define relationships and target schema tables via XSD files.

Read more »

The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset.This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them.Customize workflow processes visually and interactively.The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs.The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools.The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making.The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions.This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction.

Read more »

Cons
Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built.My only request is that they decrease the license costs.We would like to have more granular control for interface styling.The documentation needs to be improved.Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases.A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose.The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards.It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem.

Read more »

The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky.There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help.This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites.The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation.If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable.The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation.Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus.The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost depends on the number of users, although I recommend taking an unlimited license.It's good value for the price.I think that if somebody is really serious at looking at business value, then by all means, the product is well worth the value. You get representative business value for the price that you pay for the product, and for the implementation of the product.Product pricing compared to some of the earlier vendors, like IBM, CA, and Oracle, is quite well-priced. Although, we do feel that as we increase the number of users and the workload increases, we will have to spend more.We will have to have a dialogue or negotiate a price for future use. To start with, it is a reasonable price. As we go ahead, we will have to make sure the costs are inline with our expectations as we grow our user base and workloads.

Read more »

Great value for the money.This solution has a very lost cost.The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy.The price is so reasonable.I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low costSetup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user.Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,980
Comparisons
7,654
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
473
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
8,569
Comparisons
1,429
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
352
Avg. Rating
9.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Learn
Appian
Comindware
Overview
With Appian, your organization can rapidly build, deploy, use, and scale problem-solving apps. And with the flexibility of on-premises and cloud portability, you'll always address your unique challenges the way that makes the most sense for you.

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

  • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
  • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
  • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
  • Unified Document and Data Management
  • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
  • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


Offer
Learn more about Appian
Learn more about Comindware Tracker
Sample Customers
Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of TennesseeAnthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Healthcare Company13%
University13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company24%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider7%
Transportation Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business58%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email