We performed a comparison between Appian and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The initial setup is easy."
"The tech support is quite good."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"It is really simple to create a new app, and I like the data-centric aspect of the BPM tool."
"Appian helps you do a lot of things. It's easy to configure and build an application platform, and it offers a lot of features that you find in an RPA solution. It's flexible so you can reuse it for a variety of use cases."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"I wouldn't say their response time is long, but it could be quicker."
"Appian could include other applications that we could reuse for other customers, CRM for example."
"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"The solution could improve by being more responsive when dealing with large quantities of data. Additionally, they can make the decision or rules engine better. It cannot handle too many rules or too many decisions at once."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.