We performed a comparison between Appian and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster."
"SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."
"Recently, we added Appian Process Mining, Appian Portals, and now Appian RPA."
"The product has a very good mobile app."
"Call Web Service Smart Service - Web service integrations with other systems are super simple and fast to create, supported by low code menus."
"The interface is really good."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved."
"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved."
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"The setup is complex."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, ARIS Cloud and Camunda. See our Appian vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.