Compare Appian vs. Nintex Workflow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Platform Logo
37,930 views|24,802 comparisons
Appian Logo
15,541 views|11,898 comparisons
Nintex Workflow Logo
3,643 views|2,510 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored.""Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed.""The process models provide self-documenting systems.""We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features.""Appian also has very flexible local integration.""Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes.""In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement.""The product has a very good mobile app."

More Appian Pros »

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability.""It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well.""The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

More Nintex Workflow Pros »

Cons
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"The documentation needs to be improved.""We would like to have more granular control for interface styling.""My only request is that they decrease the license costs.""The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively.""They should provide more flexibility so designers can create a more picture perfect device.""Lacks integration with other products.""It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved.""We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."

More Appian Cons »

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.""The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems.""The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

More Nintex Workflow Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost depends on the number of users, although I recommend taking an unlimited license.""The solution offers a monthly subscription model. That's what we use. I recall it being about $90 a month. They do have different tiers.""It's an enterprise tool and can be used by enterprise only. So it's a very expensive tool.""The licensing will be on a monthly basis. We are estimating that cost to be around $2000 to maybe $3,000 per month. We don't foresee any costs above that.""The pricing can be a little confusing to customers."

More Appian Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Comparatively, it's expensive.""We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year.""The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

More Nintex Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine
Top Answer: The pricing can be a little confusing to customers. Clients sometimes have to lay out their whole set of use cases and… more »
Top Answer: The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified. When we're dealing with a large number of… more »
Top Answer: The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients… more »
Top Answer: The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Nintex Workflow Platform
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

With Appian, your organization can rapidly build, deploy, use, and scale problem-solving apps. And with the flexibility of on-premises and cloud portability, you'll always address your unique challenges the way that makes the most sense for you.

At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Appian
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
Asiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Computer Software Company19%
University13%
Healthcare Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise60%
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Appian is ranked 5th in Business Process Management with 12 reviews while Nintex Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management with 4 reviews. Appian is rated 8.6, while Nintex Workflow is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Offers flexible local integration that we have used extensively to integrate with our Legacy system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". Appian is most compared with Pega BPM, ServiceNow, Mendix, Salesforce Platform and OutSystems, whereas Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Pega BPM, AgilePoint, Bizagi and Apache Airflow. See our Appian vs. Nintex Workflow report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.