Compare Appian vs. ProcessMaker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appian Logo
14,178 views|10,590 comparisons
ProcessMaker Logo
315 views|215 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored.""Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed.""The process models provide self-documenting systems.""We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features.""Appian also has very flexible local integration.""Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes.""Form building capabilities and well thought out process modelling are key points to this product."

More Appian Pros »

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros »

Cons
"The documentation needs to be improved.""We would like to have more granular control for interface styling.""My only request is that they decrease the license costs.""The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively.""They should provide more flexibility so designers can create a more picture perfect device.""Lacks integration with other products.""Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."

More Appian Cons »

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

More ProcessMaker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost depends on the number of users, although I recommend taking an unlimited license.""The solution offers a monthly subscription model. That's what we use. I recall it being about $90 a month. They do have different tiers."

More Appian Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities.
Top Answer: This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects. This will make it more impactful because as it… more »
Top Answer: ProcessMaker is an Omnibus-style software. We use it for many of the services within the bank, such as generating a form or filling out a form that passes through different layers of approval. There… more »
Ranking
Views
14,178
Comparisons
10,590
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
483
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
315
Comparisons
215
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,215
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMSProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
Learn
Appian
ProcessMaker
Overview
With Appian, your organization can rapidly build, deploy, use, and scale problem-solving apps. And with the flexibility of on-premises and cloud portability, you'll always address your unique challenges the way that makes the most sense for you.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Offer
Learn more about Appian
Learn more about ProcessMaker
Sample Customers
Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of TennesseeTulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
University17%
Computer Software Company17%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Appian is ranked 7th in Business Process Management with 7 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 20th in Business Process Management with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.6, while ProcessMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Offers flexible local integration that we have used extensively to integrate with our Legacy system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Appian is most compared with ServiceNow, Pega BPM, Camunda BPM, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda BPM, Bonita and Apache Airflow.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.