AppNeta by Broadcom vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
50 views|16 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Quest Software Logo
views| comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's technical support is very good.""Delivery and experience are valuable. The usage in terms of the traffic application captures and other similar things is also valuable.""The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues.""This solution helps prove that, if we move to cloud, we'll still be as effective as we are on-premises.""A lot of times one of the AppNeta transactions showed that there is an issue, whereas everything seemed to be working properly. Once we dug into it, we realized that it really was highlighting a problem that otherwise we would not have seen.""We get complete, hop-by-hop visibility into the internet and we can know how much latency is taking place from one hop to another. That way, we know whether a particular hop belongs to the ISP, or that it is something owned by our own client's office, or is something to do with the SaaS network.""The main feature that we use is what they call Delivery, which is the testing of network paths end-to-end."

More AppNeta by Broadcom Pros →

"Dell Foglight does analyze and optimize your virtual infrastructure. It definitely reduces operational cost.""Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable.""FxV is valuable as we can playback the session.""Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur.""It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers.""With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session.""Intuitive, Single-pane-of-glass dashboards for real-time statistics and long-term statistics for capacity management and in-depth analytics""The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes.""I think some of the product's documentation has shortcomings and needs improvement.""Cloud monitoring could be better. That's one of the biggest pain points for me. I have shared this feedback with them multiple times, but they're limited to some extent. That's one area where I've seen a problem.""Instead of integrating with other people, they should expand their interior capabilities.""AppNeta by Broadcom needs to add more features to its dashboards. It also needs to work on providing out-of-the-box reports.""I would like to see some advanced dashboard features. It could also be integrated with third-party tools. For example, an integration with a reporting solution would be helpful. Out-of-the-box, there are few dashboards or reports. What it does have is useful, but there should be additional dashboards.""Having to deal with configuring the end devices using a USB stick is a bit cumbersome. It would be nice if there was a better way of handling that."

More AppNeta by Broadcom Cons →

"I want to see mobile access application in the next release.""We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort.""They need to improve the stability of FxM and FxV.""Being able to incorporate other bespoke monitoring into Foglight would have made the tool even more useful.""SQL agents often failed but again this may have been addressed in future versions.""I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace.""I think installation and setup needs little more improvement especially when you are installing with external database.""I would perhaps like to see more SSMS connections."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I inherited this from a different version, and I haven't yet gone through a renewal because we had purchased three years upfront. So, to me, that still remains to be seen. Once it comes up for renewal, we'll see what happens. Especially because now it is Broadcom, it is going to change anyway."
  • "Broadcom software is always a little expensive because they provide quality."
  • "We typically don't get involved in the commercial side, but the list price is probably something like $3,000 for a small probe. However, that gives all of the features that the probe can do, whether or not you use them. In the old days, up until two or three years ago, each of the separate features was a separately licensable module so that you could add things that you wanted, and you didn't have to add things that you didn't want. They've changed all that now, and everything the probe can do is a part of the base license."
  • "The small probe is probably around $3,000 and the very large probe that they make for massive data centers might be $50,000 or $60,000. It's a subscription model, so the payment is per year."
  • "It's worth the money."
  • "I find the solution's price to be fairly good."
  • "AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive."
  • More AppNeta by Broadcom Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."
  • "The price is expensive for us."
  • "Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."
  • "Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."
  • More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DX NetOps solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One I am looking closely at is AppNeta. They have an appliance that can digest the flow and do a better job than Netflow The other one we are using is ExtraHop.  This has both a Datacenter… more »
    Top Answer:The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 4 in DX NetOps
    Views
    50
    Comparisons
    16
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    1,490
    Rating
    9.0
    Unranked
    In DX NetOps
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Foglight, Dell Foglight
    Learn More
    Quest Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    AppNeta is the leader in proactive end-user performance monitoring solutions built for the distributed digital enterprise. With AppNeta, IT and Network Ops teams can assure continuous and exceptional delivery of business-critical applications. AppNeta’s SaaS-based solutions give IT teams essential application and network performance data, allowing them to constantly monitor user experience across any application, network, data center or cloud. 

    For more information, visit www.appneta.com.

    Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
    Sample Customers
    Ebay, Citrix, National Instruments, Marriott, AT&T, Bon-Ton, McDonald's, Netflix, PayPal, Uber, QAD
    Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Healthcare Company15%
    University15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company45%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Educational Organization11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise47%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Spectrum
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Spectrum and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppNeta by Broadcom is ranked 3rd in DX NetOps with 17 reviews while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in DX NetOps. AppNeta by Broadcom is rated 8.6, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppNeta by Broadcom writes "Excellent support, easy configuration, and a reliable tool to know what the problem is and where the problem is". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] writes "We evaluated other options including BMC, but chose Foglight for it's notifications & the ability to review the history". AppNeta by Broadcom is most compared with ThousandEyes, DX NetOps, vRealize Network Insight, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with Catchpoint.

    We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.