• Home
  • AppPulse Suite [EOL] vs. Germain

AppPulse Suite [EOL] vs Germain comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

AppPulse Suite [EOL]

Read 15 AppPulse Suite [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Germain Software Logo

Germain

Read 1 Germain review
236 views|175 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AppPulse Suite [EOL] and Germain based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
The speed in which we were able to deploy it was the most valuable area for me.
We use AppPulse to look at two of our most important applications. Our contact centers that take calls from our customers, and our website that our... Read more →
Jason M
Provides an accurate view into the user experience for Siebel Open UI and Java
Before Germain, we were reactive to users reporting issues with slow performance. Now we can monitor in near-real time their experience, and... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was a no-brainer from a cost perspective compared to the other tools that we buy as an IT organization."

    • More AppPulse Suite [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    64th
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    236
    Comparisons
    175
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus AppPulse Suite, HPE AppPulse Mobile, AppPulse Mobile, AppPulse
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Germain Software
    Overview

    Micro Focus AppPulse Mobile is the first self-service SaaS solution that tracks the real user experience of your mobile apps constantly monitoring performance, stability and resource usage. The tool provides FunDex – a mobile app quality score that provides a top-level view of problems that negatively impact the user experience with recommendations to explore and fix the root cause of each issue.

    Germain is a small yet growing organization with a number of large customers (eBay, American Airlines, Nestle, Pepsi, Tele2, etc) leveraging Germain’s two software technologies: Germain APM(Application Performance Monitoring software, Real-time, 24x7, Big Data) and Germain CRT(Automated Code/Object Performance review software). Germain is 100% focused on building software technologies intended to help IT organizations proactively understand and improve the performance of their Business Applications (CRM, ERP, eCommerce, HR, Supply Chain, Business Intelligence) and underlying infrastructure. Germain APM helps Application Administrators proactively monitor Real User Experience, End-to-end Application Performance, Network, Database, Operating System performance and more. Germain CRT helps Application Developers detect bad Code/Objects that are known to cause performance issues. In 2006, Germain built a Performance Monitoring software for Siebel CRM; In 2014, Germain launched a brand new germain APM, end-to-end, real-time, big data and able to monitor performance of any Applications (custom apps built in java, .net and packaged applications like salesforce.com, WordPress site, oracle application and databases, Microsoft application and databases, etc). more info on: germainAPM.com
    Sample Customers
    SpeechTrans, Gulliver Group
    American Airlines, eBay, Pepsi, Nestle, Tata Sky, Siemens, Allan Gray, Tele2, Tinkoff Bank, etc
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Energy/Utilities Company29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government14%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise38%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppPulse Suite [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Germain is ranked 64th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppPulse Suite [EOL] is rated 8.4, while Germain is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AppPulse Suite [EOL] writes "The speed in which we were able to deploy it was the most valuable area for me". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Germain writes "Provides an accurate view into the user experience for Siebel Open UI and Java". AppPulse Suite [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Germain is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.