Apptricity Work Order [EOL] vs TOA Technologies ETAdirect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apptricity Work Order [EOL] and TOA Technologies ETAdirect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Field Service Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Field Service Management
9th
Views
139
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ETAdirect
Learn More
Overview

Apptricity Work Order is a comprehensive solution, automating your work order processing from start to finish and capturing all the details in between. This state-of-the-art system allows dispatchers to quickly see workers and adjust orders while simultaneously tracking labor hours, tools and consumables used on the job. Finally, have all the tools needed to keep workers organized, management informed and processes streamlined.

Whether you are tracking internal services or assigning charges for customer billing, Work Order seamlessly tracks and ensures proper accounting.

  • Improve turn-around times for service work and provide visibility into service costs and time spent; completed jobs are clearly documented, eliminating the confusion inherent in a paper-based work order system.
  • In just a few clicks, the easy-to-use, customizable interface allows you to add new work orders using pre-built templates to ensure the order has proper instructions and necessary parts.
  • Ensure workers and dispatchers remain organized and productive through automatic prioritization and scheduling jobs based on predefined specifications.
  • Managers and executives can view work order status at any time, including summary graphs showing overall productivity and timeliness, thereby enforcing accountability, ensuring timely completion of requested services and keeping costs within budget.

Work Order can be utilized as a standalone product or seamlessly integrated with Apptricity Asset for job-based asset usage and to support MR&O processes or with Apptricity Inventory to manage receiving, movement, adjustments and associate inventory with assets and work orders enterprise wide.

TOA Technologies is the leading provider of cloud-based mobile workforce management applications. ETAdirect improves customer service while dramatically reducing operational costs and delivering immediate return on investment. As the industry's only complete on-demand solution using predictive, time-based analytics, ETAdirect reduces customer wait times and increasing field workforce efficiency. TOA's system deploys quickly, is highly configurable and easily integrates with existing systems.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Virgin Media, Cox Communications
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apptricity Work Order [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Field Service Management while TOA Technologies ETAdirect is ranked 9th in Field Service Management. Apptricity Work Order [EOL] is rated 0.0, while TOA Technologies ETAdirect is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Apptricity Work Order [EOL] is most compared with , whereas TOA Technologies ETAdirect is most compared with .

See our list of best Field Service Management vendors.

We monitor all Field Service Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.