Appvance IQ vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appvance Logo
597 views|366 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
185 views|113 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appvance IQ and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Srprogmagr567
Ranking
28th
Views
597
Comparisons
366
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
37th
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Appvance
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Overview

Appvance.ai is the leader in AI-driven testing, which is revolutionizing how software testing is performed. The company’s premier product is Appvance IQ™, the world’s first AI-driven, unified test automation system. AIQ empowers enterprises to improve the quality, performance and security of their apps, while transforming the efficiency and output of their testing teams.

Appvance IQ was launched in late 2017, helping Appvance.ai to become among the fastest growing test automation companies in the world, and the leader in the new category of AI driven testing.

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
Cisco, Bell Canada, CBS, UBC, PepsiCo, 7-11, BenefitVision, Kabbage, Catalent Pharmaceuticals, McKesson, Veritas, Cherwell, QAT Global, Sony, SiriusXM, CoPart, Auto Parts Alliance, PPD
Migros Bank AG
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Government15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Insurance Company9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Appvance IQ is ranked 28th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Appvance IQ is rated 8.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Appvance IQ writes "Network Emulation allows for performance testing of geographically-distributed users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Appvance IQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Automaton, SmartBear TestComplete and ReadyAPI, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.