Compare Aqua Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Aqua Security is ranked 5th in Container Security with 5 reviews while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 8 reviews. Aqua Security is rated 9.2, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aqua Security writes "Integrated with our existing platform, providing visibility into container image vulnerabilities and access control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "We are able to filter alerts by security level so our teams understand which situations are critical". Aqua Security is most compared with Sysdig Secure, StackRox, Tenable.io Container Security, Snyk and Qualys Container Security, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Dome9, Sysdig Secure, Check Point CloudGuard SaaS, StackRox and Snyk. See our Aqua Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about Aqua Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and manage.The most valuable feature is the security.We use Aqua Security for the container security features.Aqua Security allowed us to gain visibility into the vulnerabilities that were present in the container images, that were being rolled out, the amount of risk that we were introducing to the platform, and provided us a look into the container environment by introducing access control mechanisms. In addition, when it came to runtime-level policies, we could restrict container access to resources in our environment, such as network-level or other application-level access.Valuable features include the ability to connect it to our Docker Hub where our images are stored, good integration with Slack, and the connection to the CV, to easily see which CVs are on each image.

More Aqua Security Pros »

I was looking for a vulnerability scanner and I was looking for one place in which I could find everything. This tool not only does vulnerability scanning, but it also gives me an asset management tool.One of the most valuable features is the compliance of RedLock, which we are using for any issues with security. It flags them and that's the primary objective of that feature.I would say Twistlock is a fairly sophisticated tool.The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass.The runtime mechanism on the solution is very useful. It's got very good network mapping between containers. If you have more than one container, you can create a content data link between them.The most valuable feature is that the rule set is managed and that it can be run on a regularly scheduled basis.It has helped us understand the dynamic topology of our containers, and manage security through the application of policies that our pipelines apply straight from Git.The dynamic workload identity creation, attestation, and assignment is the best feature. In addition, the application dependency map across heterogeneous environments for compliance is a striking feature.

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pros »

Cons
They want to release improvements to their product to work with other servers because now there are more focused on the Kubernetes environment. They need to improve the normal servers. I would like to have more options.Since we are working from home, we would like to have the proper training for Aqua.I would like Aqua Security to look into is the development of a web security portal.

More Aqua Security Cons »

We would like it to have more features from the risk and compliance perspectives.The feedback that we have given to the Palo Alto team is that the UI can be improved. When you press the "back" button on your browser from the Investigate tab, the query that you're working on just disappears. It won't keep the query on the "back" button.In terms of improvement, there are some small things like hardening and making sure the Linux resources are deployed well but that's more at an operational level.Palo Alto should work on ease-of-use and the user-friendliness to be more competitive with some competing products.The innovation side of the solution could be more efficient and more detailed.The pricing for the solution needs improvement.I would like to see the inclusion of automated counter-attack, although this is probably illegal.More documentation with real-world use cases would be helpful.

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They were reasonable with their pricing. They were pretty down-to-earth about the way they pitched their product and the way they tried to close the deal. They were one of the rare companies that approached the whole valuation in a way that made sense for our company, for our needs, and for their own requirements as well... They will accommodate your needs if they are able to understand them and they're stated clearly.

More Aqua Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year.The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution.

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
out of 17 in Container Security
Views
11,069
Comparisons
8,281
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
745
Avg. Rating
9.3
1st
out of 17 in Container Security
Views
21,750
Comparisons
16,807
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
542
Avg. Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
Learn
Aqua Security
Palo Alto Networks
Overview

The Aqua Container Security Platform provides development-to-production lifecycle controls for securing containerized applications that run on-premises or in the cloud, on Windows or Linux, supporting multiple orchestration environments.

The move to the cloud has changed all aspects of the application development lifecycle – security being foremost among them. Security and DevOps teams face a growing number of entities to secure as organizations adopt cloud native approaches. Ever-changing environments challenge developers to build and deploy at a frantic pace, while security teams remain responsible for the protection and compliance of the entire lifecycle. Prisma™ Cloud by Palo Alto Networks delivers complete security across the development lifecycle on any cloud, enabling you to develop cloud native applications with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Aqua Security
Learn more about Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Sample Customers
HPE Salesforce Telstra Ellie Mae Cathay Pacific HomeAwayAmgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Aqua Security vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.