Aranda Patch Management vs Comodo Patch Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aranda Patch Management and Comodo Patch Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Aranda Patch Management?
Donald Baldwin
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:If you want to protect your stuff, you must get good products. It is value for money. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
Top Answer:We use the solution to manage updates. I want to ensure everything is updated first and manage things so that we don't end up with strange behavior on the computer or fail to understand what's… more »
Top Answer:One person is enough to do the maintenance. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Ranking
24th
out of 50 in Patch Management
Views
96
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
out of 50 in Patch Management
Views
75
Comparisons
45
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
395
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

It prevents external attacks and security risks, without interrupting the work of the users and reducing travel and time investment costs; keeping all the workstations in your organization updated, with the latest patches and updates released by solution manufacturers.

Comodo Patch Manager gives administrators and MSPs granular control over the deployment of updates to operating systems and 3rd party applications on network endpoints. Featuring a centralized, easy to use interface, Comodo Patch Manager allows administrators to:

  • Remotely deploy operating system updates for Windows and Linux based machines and 3rd party applications.
  • View dashboard statistics that provide detailed breakdowns of available updates for endpoint machines.
  • Identify endpoints which contain vulnerabilities and need to be patched.
  • Create policies to automatically apply updates to groups of tagged endpoints at scheduled times.
  • Create custom endpoint tags which can be applied to logical groups of endpoints.
  • View granular reports on the hardware, software and update history of endpoint machines.
Sample Customers
Grupo Aval, Credomatic, Zurich, Redeban, Interbanking, Cooperativa, Insurance Caracas, ACH, Mapfre, Sofisa Bank, Public Services of Heredia, Buenos Aires waters, Western Union, Pacific Airport Group, KPMG, Transantiago
76BITS, Convey2Web, Marly Computers vof, XL Pro PC
Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aranda Patch Management is ranked 24th in Patch Management while Comodo Patch Management is ranked 18th in Patch Management with 1 review. Aranda Patch Management is rated 0.0, while Comodo Patch Management is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo Patch Management writes "A cost-effective solution for managing updates with many protection layers". Aranda Patch Management is most compared with , whereas Comodo Patch Management is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.