Compare ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. CyberArk PAS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. CyberArk PAS and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup is very straightforward. It's not complex at all.""100% compliant and you don't have to maintain ID management for each and every user."

More ARCON Privileged Access Management Pros »

"For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.""When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good."

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs more work on the password management side of things. Password management is a big challenge for us, and I would like to improve this aspect. We're finding that BeyondTrust is better in this regard, which is why we're probably going to migrate over. It will offer better security I think.""Hazard flow could be improved, the data compliance portion."

More ARCON Privileged Access Management Cons »

"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process."

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,723
Comparisons
1,747
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
495
Rating
8.0
Views
38,468
Comparisons
18,473
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
546
Rating
9.1
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ARCON ARCOS, ARCON PAMCyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
ARCON
CyberArk
Overview

ARCON PAM is a full blown Privileged Access Management solution. It has a robust password vaulting technology that comes with AES- 256 Database encryption. Dual Factor Authentication, 4Eye Authentication functionalities and Granular Access Control enables an enterprise to block any unauthorized access attempt to critical information assets. All access is based on “Need to know” and “Need to do” basis. It has the largest connector stack. Its Single Sign On enables seamless access to a host of devices with just a single click.

The Solution enables an enterprise to monitor and analyze advanced threats in a real time. It has the best-in-class real-time threat analytics. It provides comprehensive audit trails and session recordings to ensure that all activities are tracked and these logs are encrypted and separately stored creating a legal hold.

Further, it has a highly scalable architecture that easily integrates with Third Party SIEM Solutions. It also supports cloud environment.

ARCON PAM is full-functionality solution at the most optimum pricing. More than 250 global enterprises spanning wide-ranging industries such as Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI), Government Organizations, Media, Health Care, and Fintech have deployed ARCON PAM as of today.

While the company continues to be a leader in India and the Middle East, it has gained a solid traction in Africa and APAC market thanks to its well-distributed global channel network and strong industry reputation it enjoys in the cyber security domain.

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Offer
Learn more about ARCON Privileged Access Management
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Sample Customers
RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS Rockwell Automation
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm82%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm8%
University8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise72%
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. CyberArk PAS and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ARCON Privileged Access Management is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management with 3 reviews while CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 20 reviews. ARCON Privileged Access Management is rated 8.0, while CyberArk PAS is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management writes "Good security with an easy initial setup and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". ARCON Privileged Access Management is most compared with Symantec Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, WALLIX Bastion, Thycotic Secret Server and One Identity Manager, whereas CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and One Identity Safeguard. See our ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. CyberArk PAS report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.