We performed a comparison between ARCON Privileged Access Management and Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The video logs help us to identify any misuse of privileged accounts."
"The most valuable feature is it is easy to use and the interface is intuitive."
"The best part of this product is the administrator convenience. The portal is very user-friendly. An administrator can use it very easily."
"Video and audio logs are there for any activities that the privileged admin carries out."
"It is recording video records for Windows and command-line reports for others, Linux and AIX, of whatever activities being carries by that particular administrator."
"Previously, we had to go through some effort to change the credentials of our devices. The process was subject to human error... For things like managing credentials, some kind of register had to be maintained. With the Password Vault of ARCON, all these processes are automated. The credentials are changed, as per the schedule. The information is encrypted, kept in our vault, and sent to all the email addresses within the ARCON solution itself."
"The user interface, overall, is really good. If I have some 20 servers in my ID, I can easily see for which servers I have read-only access, for which servers I have prompt-access, and for which servers I have server admin access."
"The notification alert feature where the network admin gets notified of probable malicious activity is the most valuable feature."
"It's more of a risk reduction. It takes passwords that are not being managed properly and manages them automatically which really reduces risk."
"There are some features lacking but they typically are added when the upgrades are released."
"Managing users is difficult, so that is something that can be improved."
"Hazard flow could be improved, the data compliance portion."
"ARCON Privileged Access Management is not a user-friendly solution, and the application flow from one screen to another is very complex."
"We expect improvement in the dashboards to provide visibility of password compliance status, whenever a password is opened from the vault. Also, flexibility to customize the live dashboard."
"The usability should be expanded to other browsers like Chrome and Firefox."
"One common problem I faced with ARCON PAM was compatibility issues with certain software versions."
"The solution needs more work on the password management side of things. Password management is a big challenge for us, and I would like to improve this aspect. We're finding that BeyondTrust is better in this regard, which is why we're probably going to migrate over. It will offer better security I think."
"They should improve the application password management. The capability to manage high availability application passwords is its biggest shortcoming."
More ARCON Privileged Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ARCON Privileged Access Management is ranked 8th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 32 reviews while Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM). ARCON Privileged Access Management is rated 7.8, while Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management writes "Offers good session monitoring and recording features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] writes "It’s greatest ability is that it can easily randomize all local accounts on almost any endpoint". ARCON Privileged Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ManageEngine PAM360 and Delinea Secret Server, whereas Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
