Arcot RiskFort [EOL] vs Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arcot RiskFort [EOL] and Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Unranked
In Fraud Detection and Prevention
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
RiskFort
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Overview
RiskFort provides real-time protection against identity theft and online fraud via riskÐbased, adaptive authentication. It evaluates the fraud potential of online access attempts (including everything from enterprise online services to consumer e-commerce transactions) and calculates the risk score based on a broad set of variables.
Oracle Adaptive Access Manager helps organizations prevent fraud and misuse by strengthening existing authentication flows, evaluating the risk of events as they happen and providing risk-based interdiction mechanisms such as multi-factor out-of-band authentication. Intuitive policy administration and standardized integrations with the Identity and Access Management Suite components makes Oracle Adaptive Access Manager uniquely flexible and effective at reducing an enterprise's security exposure. Oracle Adaptive Access Manager provides real-time and batch risk analytics to combat fraud and misuse across multiple channels of access. It automates reviews of access and transaction events to detect fraud and misuse resulting in saved time and money, a proven capabilities and quick return on investment.
Sample Customers
Global bank
Department of Conservation, New Zealand, Sudhir Power Ltd., Joyo Bank Ltd., Boxfusion, Mitsubishi Corporation, Saga d.o.o. Beograd, Asia Commercial Bank, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Yapi Kredi Bank, Overhead Door Corporation, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Arcot RiskFort [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Arcot RiskFort [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Arcot RiskFort [EOL] writes "Product review for RiskFort". On the other hand, Arcot RiskFort [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Adaptive Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.