ArcSight Analytics vs Citrix Analytics for Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
308 views|149 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Citrix Logo
171 views|107 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Citrix Analytics for Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.""One of the most valuable features is the alerts.""Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing.""This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard.""ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.""ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring.""The correlation engine is good.""Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros →

"Very good scalability.""The solution is easy to handle."

More Citrix Analytics for Security Pros →

Cons
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done.""I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation.""Their support team could be better.""The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with.""Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors.""Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked.""The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed.""ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons →

"Lacks recording features.""The remote access features need improvement."

More Citrix Analytics for Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
  • "The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
  • "In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
  • "It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
  • "This solution is expensive."
  • "My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
  • More ArcSight Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is fairly priced. There are no additional costs involved, one only needs to pay the licensing cost."
  • More Citrix Analytics for Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
    Top Answer:ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
    Top Answer:My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
    Top Answer:The solution is fairly priced. There are no additional costs involved, one only needs to pay the licensing cost.
    Top Answer:The remote access features need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    315
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    171
    Comparisons
    107
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    306
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
    Citrix Analytics for Performance
    Learn More
    Overview

    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

    The future works with actionable insights
    Organizations have more rich data available to them than ever before, but data is only as good as the insights it provides and the actions you can take on it. Gathering this data can be unwieldy and making sense of it can be overwhelming. With machine learning applied to data that spans network traffic, users, files, and endpoints, you can identify and take action on user behavior and app performance.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Scripps Health, Sydney University, Element Six, Lindex, SAS
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Educational Organization14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Citrix Analytics for Security is ranked 18th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Citrix Analytics for Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Analytics for Security writes "Helped the organization to provide high-security access to applications and performs well". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Citrix Analytics for Security is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.