We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Cynet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The correlation engine is good."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"I like the Cynet Correlator™ feature."
"Cynet is light and transparent when downloaded. The product's data aggregation is also valuable since you can see everything you need on a page."
"It provides good protection from ransomware and malware attacks. It is very good as compared to other products. If any threat is there, their support is very good. They immediately respond to the users and do a follow-up. They call us and also provide email support."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is a complete solution, which makes cyber security very free and almost perfect. There is no such thing as perfect cyber security, but as far as it can go, sign it comes close to being perfect and holistic. Cynet is always comprehensive from the perspective of functionality, as well as from the standpoint that it encompasses not only technology but also processes and people. The triad of people, processes, and technology is crucial and should always be in place. To my knowledge, no other product or platform combines all three components into one, but Cynet does."
"The level of automation is very good because the majority of the time, it blocks the attacks without requiring anything from our side. The technicians don't have to do anything. They are just alerted about what happened. So, the user intelligence works quite well."
"We are protecting all our workstations."
"It is quite stable. I would rate the stability of the solution a nine out of ten."
"I have found the continued support and pretty much all the features to be valuable. They all stand out as being positive. It continues to detect unusual activity when it's supposed to, and so far we haven't had any issues."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Detections could be improved."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"I would like to see orchestration."
"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"There are some shortcomings in Cynet's integration capabilities that need improvement."
"We'd like something that makes it easier to manage specific points."
"I'd like to see more data loss prevention within the product."
"I think the technical support could be better."
"Automation could be improved, and orchestration could be added to the features."
"I would like to see more emphasis on building the data lake and storing all endpoint data in the enterprise data lake so that data mining can be performed"
"The command line interface could be improved."
"They have automated response capability, and they're moving more and more into SOAR capability. They have built-in deception technology with host-file users, phantoms, etc. We used to call them honeypots. So, they're on target. They're doing a really good job, and they should continue to improve with SOAR."
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Cynet is ranked 4th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 35 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Cynet is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cynet writes "Provides memory protection, device control, and vulnerability management". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Cynet is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Cynet report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.