Compare ArcSight Analytics vs. DNIF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ArcSight Analytics Logo
586 views|284 comparisons
DNIF Logo
Read 2 DNIF reviews.
2,141 views|1,446 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. DNIF and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features.""One of the most valuable features is the alerts.""The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability.""This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard.""This solution allows us to identify connections for all users.""Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion.""The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros »

"The response time on queries is super-fast.""The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network.""The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

More DNIF Pros »

Cons
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training.""I would like to see orchestration.""It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex.""There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console.""I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation.""The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use.""The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with.""The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons »

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful.""The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

More DNIF Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.""In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance.""It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."

More ArcSight Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is based on the log size."

More DNIF Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection.
Top Answer: ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user-friendliness. The product is complex. The algorithm is not so complex to implement, but… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution for monitoring our network. It does authentication failure monitoring, VPN log monitoring, internal threat monitoring, and outside threat monitoring. It also looks for IOCs and… more »
Top Answer: The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable.
Top Answer: The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time. There needs to be more… more »
Top Answer: We have integrated all our network devices, our servers, and our applications as well as some customized applications. We use the solution to collect the logs. We track items such as unsuccessful… more »
Ranking
Views
586
Comparisons
284
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
397
Avg. Rating
6.6
Views
2,141
Comparisons
1,446
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
990
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 52% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Learn
Micro Focus
NETMONASTERY
Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

DNIF offers solutions to the world’s most challenging cybersecurity problems. Recognized by Gartner and used by some of the well-known global companies like PwC, Vodafone and Tata, this next generation analytics platform combines Security and Big Data Analytics to provide real-time threat detection and analytics to the most critical data assets on the Internet. With over a decade of experience in threat detection systems, DNIF has one of the fastest query response times and bridges the gap between searching, processing, analyzing and visualizing data thereby enabling companies with better SOC (Security Operations Center) management.

Offer
Learn more about ArcSight Analytics
Learn more about DNIF
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Vodafone India, IDEA Cellular, RBL Bank, NCDEX, NSE
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider36%
Computer Software Company31%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. DNIF and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 12th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 9 reviews while DNIF is ranked 11th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 6.6, while DNIF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "A mature and well-regarded cyber security solution for big data, network security, and analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DNIF writes "Powerful analytics and machine-learning enable us to find attack patterns". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, Forcepoint UEBA, Varonis Datalert and Aruba IntroSpect, whereas DNIF is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and ELK Logstash. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. DNIF report.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.