ArcSight Analytics vs Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion.""This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard.""The correlation engine is good.""The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability.""The solution is easy to implement.""One of the most valuable features is the alerts.""ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.""ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros →

"One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult.""The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →

Cons
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training.""Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked.""The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with.""ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness.""Their support team could be better.""I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation.""I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time.""There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons →

"The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good.""Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats."

More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
  • "The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
  • "In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
  • "It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
  • "This solution is expensive."
  • "My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
  • More ArcSight Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution is good. It is less expensive than the other solutions in the market. There are not any additional features or hidden costs."
  • More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
    Top Answer:ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
    Top Answer:My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats.
    Top Answer:The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good.
    Top Answer:We are using Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System to look for threats in our network, such as barriers and malicious software.
    Ranking
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    315
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    62
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
    Hillstone sBDS
    Learn More
    Overview

    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

    The Hillstone Server Breach Detection System (sBDS) adopts multiple threat detection technologies that include both traditional signature-based technology as well as large-scale threat intelligent data modeling and user behavioral analytics modeling, which provides an ideal solution to detect unknown or 0-day threat attacks, to protect high-value, critical servers and their sensitive data from being leaked or stolen. Together with deep threat hunting analysis capabilities and visibility, Hillstone sBDS provides security admins the effective means to detect IOCs (Indicators of Compromise) events, restore the threat attack kill chain and provide extensive visibility into threat intelligence analysis and mitigations.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Norbert Wiener University, Regional Government of the Amazon
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Educational Organization14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 22nd in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.